{"id":953,"date":"2013-04-16T09:00:25","date_gmt":"2013-04-16T08:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/?p=953"},"modified":"2013-11-08T16:42:29","modified_gmt":"2013-11-08T15:42:29","slug":"suppliques-de-warren-buffett-pour-etre-taxe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/suppliques-de-warren-buffett-pour-etre-taxe\/","title":{"rendered":"Suppliques de Warren Buffett pour \u00eatre tax\u00e9 |\u00a0New York Times"},"content":{"rendered":"

Warren Buffett a publi\u00e9 deux op-ed en ao\u00fbt 2011 et novembre 2012 dans le New York Times<\/em> pour r\u00e9clam\u00e9 une augmentation de ses imp\u00f4ts.<\/p>\n

Stop Coddling the Super-Rich<\/h1>\n
By WARREN E. BUFFETT<\/h6>\n
Published: August 14, 2011<\/h6>\n

OUR leaders have asked for \u201cshared sacrifice.\u201d But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.
\nWhile the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as \u201ccarried interest,\u201d thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they\u2019d been long-term investors.
\nThese and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It\u2019s nice to have friends in high places.
\nLast year my federal tax bill \u2014 the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf \u2014 was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income \u2014 and that\u2019s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.
\nIf you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine \u2014 most likely by a lot.
\nTo understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It\u2019s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot.
\nBack in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
\nI didn\u2019t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone \u2014 not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 \u2014 shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what\u2019s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.
\nSince 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion \u2014 a staggering $227.4 million on average \u2014 but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent.
\nThe taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)
\nI know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn\u2019t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.
\nTwelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country\u2019s finances. They\u2019ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It\u2019s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country\u2019s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.
\nJob one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can\u2019t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.
\nBut for those making more than $1 million \u2014 there were 236,883 such households in 2009 \u2014 I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more \u2014 there were 8,274 in 2009 \u2014 I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
\nMy friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It\u2019s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.<\/p>\n

Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.<\/em>
\nhttp:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/08\/15\/opinion\/stop-coddling-the-super-rich.html?hp<\/p>\n

———-<\/p>\n

A Minimum Tax for the Wealthy<\/h1>\n
By\u00a0WARREN E. BUFFETT<\/h6>\n
Published: November 25, 2012<\/h6>\n

SUPPOSE that an investor you admire and trust comes to you with an investment idea. \u201cThis is a good one,\u201d he says enthusiastically. \u201cI\u2019m in it, and I think you should be, too.\u201d
\nWould your reply possibly be this? \u201cWell, it all depends on what my tax rate will be on the gain you\u2019re saying we\u2019re going to make. If the taxes are too high, I would rather leave the money in my savings account, earning a quarter of 1 percent.\u201d Only in Grover Norquist\u2019s imagination does such a response exist.
\nBetween 1951 and 1954, when the capital gains rate was 25 percent and marginal rates on dividends reached 91 percent in extreme cases, I sold securities and did pretty well. In the years from 1956 to 1969, the top marginal rate fell modestly, but was still a lofty 70 percent \u2014 and the tax rate on capital gains inched up to 27.5 percent. I was managing funds for investors then. Never did anyone mention taxes as a reason to forgo an investment opportunity that I offered.
\nUnder those burdensome rates, moreover, both employment and the gross domestic product (a measure of the nation\u2019s economic output) increased at a rapid clip. The middle class and the rich alike gained ground.
\nSo let\u2019s forget about the rich and ultrarich going on strike and stuffing their ample funds under their mattresses if \u2014 gasp \u2014 capital gains rates and ordinary income rates are increased. The ultrarich, including me, will forever pursue investment opportunities.
\nAnd, wow, do we have plenty to invest.\u00a0The Forbes 400<\/a>, the wealthiest individuals in America, hit a new group record for wealth this year: $1.7 trillion. That\u2019s more than five times the $300 billion total in 1992. In recent years, my gang has been leaving the middle class in the dust.
\nA huge tail wind from tax cuts has pushed us along. In 1992, the tax paid by the 400 highest incomes in the United States (a different universe from the Forbes list) averaged 26.4 percent of adjusted gross income. In 2009, the most recent year reported, the rate was 19.9 percent. It\u2019s nice to have friends in high places.
\nThe group\u2019s average income in 2009 was $202 million \u2014 which works out to a \u201cwage\u201d of $97,000 per hour, based on a 40-hour workweek. (I\u2019m assuming they\u2019re paid during lunch hours.) Yet more than a quarter of these ultrawealthy paid less than 15 percent of their take in combined federal income and payroll taxes. Half of this crew paid less than 20 percent. And \u2014 brace yourself \u2014 a few actually paid nothing.
\nThis outrage points to the necessity for more than a simple revision in upper-end tax rates, though that\u2019s the place to start. I support President Obama\u2019s proposal to eliminate the Bush tax cuts for high-income taxpayers. However, I prefer a cutoff point somewhat above $250,000 \u2014 maybe $500,000 or so.
\nAdditionally, we need Congress, right now, to enact a minimum tax on high incomes. I would suggest 30 percent of taxable income between $1 million and $10 million, and 35 percent on amounts above that. A plain and simple rule like that will block the efforts of lobbyists, lawyers and contribution-hungry legislators to keep the ultrarich paying rates well below those incurred by people with income just a tiny fraction of ours. Only a minimum tax on very high incomes will prevent the stated tax rate from being eviscerated by these warriors for the wealthy.
\nAbove all, we should not postpone these changes in the name of \u201creforming\u201d the tax code. True, changes are badly needed. We need to get rid of arrangements like \u201ccarried interest\u201d that enable income from labor to be magically converted into capital gains. And it\u2019s sickening that a Cayman Islands mail drop can be central to tax maneuvering by wealthy individuals and corporations.
\nBut the reform of such complexities should not promote delay in our correcting simple and expensive inequities. We can\u2019t let those who want to protect the privileged get away with insisting that we do nothing until we can do everything.
\nOur government\u2019s goal should be to bring in revenues of 18.5 percent of G.D.P. and spend about 21 percent of G.D.P. \u2014 levels that have been attained over extended periods in the past and can clearly be reached again. As the math makes clear, this won\u2019t stem our budget deficits; in fact, it will continue them. But assuming even conservative projections about inflation and economic growth, this ratio of revenue to spending will keep America\u2019s debt stable in relation to the country\u2019s economic output.
\nIn the last fiscal year, we were far away from this fiscal balance \u2014 bringing in 15.5 percent of G.D.P. in revenue and spending 22.4 percent. Correcting our course will require major concessions by both Republicans and Democrats.
\nAll of America is waiting for Congress to offer a realistic and concrete plan for getting back to this fiscally sound path. Nothing less is acceptable.
\nIn the meantime, maybe you\u2019ll run into someone with a terrific investment idea, who won\u2019t go forward with it because of the tax he would owe when it succeeds. Send him my way. Let me unburden him.<\/p>\n

Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.<\/em>
\nhttp:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/11\/26\/opinion\/buffett-a-minimum-tax-for-the-wealthy.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Warren Buffett a publi\u00e9 deux op-ed en ao\u00fbt 2011 et novembre 2012 dans le New York Times pour r\u00e9clam\u00e9 une augmentation de ses imp\u00f4ts. Stop Coddling the Super-Rich By WARREN E. BUFFETT Published: August 14, 2011 OUR leaders have asked for \u201cshared sacrifice.\u201d But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[61,79],"class_list":["post-953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","tag-fiscalite","tag-warren-buffett"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=953"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1775,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/953\/revisions\/1775"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}