{"id":197,"date":"2013-02-10T16:53:28","date_gmt":"2013-02-10T15:53:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/?p=197"},"modified":"2013-03-30T22:35:53","modified_gmt":"2013-03-30T21:35:53","slug":"like-father-not-like-son","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/like-father-not-like-son\/","title":{"rendered":"Like father, not like son | The Economist"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3>Measuring social mobility<\/h3>\n<p>The Economist, <time>Oct 13th 2012<\/time><\/p>\n<p>IN HORATIO ALGER\u2019S famous story, \u201cRagged Dick\u201d, a plucky boot shiner improves his lot through hard work, honesty and learning his \u201cthree Rs\u201d (reading, \u2019riting and \u2019rithmetic). The marks of his success are a suit, an office job and a new name, \u201cRichard Hunter, Esq\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>These days economists use more sophisticated gauges. They measure mobility over a lifetime (rags to riches, or the reverse), between generations (how children do relative to their parents), in absolute terms (whether children are richer or poorer than their parents) or in relative ones (whether children are higher or lower on the income ladder than their parents).<\/p>\n<p>When countries are growing fast there is a lot of absolute upward economic mobility. In most emerging economies children almost invariably earn more than their parents. Even in America, despite slow growth and widening income gaps, most people do better than the generation above them: a recent study by the Pew Charitable Trusts found that 84% of adult Americans had higher real incomes than their parents.<\/p>\n<p>The more important gauge of a meritocracy, however, is relative mobility, particularly between generations. In a society with broad equality of opportunity, the parents\u2019 position on the income ladder should have little impact on that of their children. Economic historians use clever techniques to measure this. Gregory Clark at the University of California, Davis, and Neil Cummins of City University of New York, for instance, have tracked families with rare surnames. Looking at English census records since 1800, they picked out names such as Bazalgette and Leschallas and compared them with records of students at elite institutions such as Oxford and Cambridge universities. Their results show that even over 200 years social mobility has been rather limited. The wealth and social status of people with rare surnames in 1800 is strongly correlated with that of their descendants today.<\/p>\n<p>Individual families\u2019 fortunes over time can now be tracked by statistical surveys. This allows economists to measure how much parents\u2019 position has influenced their adult children\u2019s relative income or education. The resulting coefficient, the inelegantly named \u201cinter-generational elasticity of income\u201d, is today\u2019s main measure of social mobility. The higher the coefficient, the less mobility there has been.<\/p>\n<p>This technique shows Scandinavian societies to be very mobile. Only around 20% of parents\u2019 relative wealth (or poverty) is passed on to their kids. China, in contrast, is fairly immobile: 60% of income differences persist between generations. The big surprise is the United States, where parental income explains around half of the differences in adult children\u2019s income, much more than in Canada, and more than in any European country except Italy and Britain. According to this measure, social mobility in America now is lower than in most of Europe.<\/p>\n<p>Another way to measure economic opportunity is to tease out what share of inequality can be explained by factors over which people have no control: race, gender, birthplace, parents\u2019 education and occupation. The smaller that fraction, the greater a country\u2019s equality of opportunity.<\/p>\n<div><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/media.economist.com\/sites\/default\/files\/imagecache\/290-width\/images\/print-edition\/20121013_SRC872.png\" width=\"290\" height=\"263\" \/><\/div>\n<p>Such an \u201cInequality of Opportunity Index\u201d was pioneered by Francisco Ferreira of the World Bank and now exists for 40 countries. At one extreme lies Norway, where only 2% of the\u2014already low\u2014inequality can be explained by accidents of birth. At the other extreme, in Brazil a third of the high income inequality is due to people\u2019s background. America is closer to Brazil than to Norway (see chart 1).<\/p>\n<p>Economists also gauge equality of opportunity by measuring disparities in children\u2019s access to basic services that will influence their prospects, such as education or running water. The World Bank is developing indices which adjust overall access to such services by a measure of the inequality in that access. South Africa, for instance, has the same overall rate of access to sanitation as Nicaragua. But once you adjust for race disparities, its \u201cHuman Opportunity Index\u201d for sanitation is much lower.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Like father, not like son\" href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/node\/21564417\">Article original<\/a> sur le site de The Economist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Measuring social mobility The Economist, Oct 13th 2012 IN HORATIO ALGER\u2019S famous story, \u201cRagged Dick\u201d, a plucky boot shiner improves his lot through hard work, honesty and learning his \u201cthree Rs\u201d (reading, \u2019riting and \u2019rithmetic). The marks of his success are a suit, an office job and a new name, \u201cRichard Hunter, Esq\u201d. These days [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":199,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197\/revisions\/199"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bliss.pro\/fracture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}